Project-finance relevance
Work connects technical assumptions to commercial outcomes, bankability and investor decision-making.
Independent project review
Due diligence that tests the engineering, market and commercial assumptions behind an energy project before money is committed.
Why it matters
Energy due diligence should not be a checklist exercise. A solar, storage, hydrogen or interconnector case can look attractive on paper while depending on fragile assumptions about yield, curtailment, tariffs, regulation, capex, dispatch or market participation.
Work connects technical assumptions to commercial outcomes, bankability and investor decision-making.
Built cost-benefit and NPV models for interconnector projects using ENTSO-E and TYNDP context.
Experience across solar, storage, green hydrogen, interconnectors and EU applied research.
Work includes
Review of yield, capex, opex, availability and degradation assumptions.
Market and regulatory risk assessment.
Commercial model stress-testing and sensitivity review.
Independent memo for investment committees, lenders or boards.
Related writing
Questions
It reviews whether the technical assumptions, operating model, market access and commercial case are coherent and robust enough for the decision being made.
No. For energy projects the technical assumptions and commercial model are inseparable, especially where market rules, curtailment or tariffs affect revenue.
Discuss a project
Share the model, memo or investment question and I will identify the assumptions that need independent review.